McConkey v. McCraney
This text of 37 N.W. 822 (McConkey v. McCraney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is clear that the service of the summons and complaint, as shown by the record, was a void service. The sheriff failed entirely to ‘serve the papers as required by subd. 4, sec. 2636, R. S., when the defendant cannot be found. It is equally clear that the clerk had no authority to enter judgment out of term, had the service been made as required by said section. See sec. 2891, R. S. That the service was void and gave the court no jurisdiction of the person of the defendant, see Weis v. Schoerner, 53 Wis. 72; Hall v. Graham, 49 Wis. 553; Matteson v. Smith, 37 Wis. [578]*578333; Sayles v. Davis, 20 Wis. 302; Pollard v. Wegener, 13 Wis. 569. That the clerk has no power to enter judgment out of term when the process is not personally served on the defendant, see Northrup v. Shephard, 26 Wis. 220; Moyer v. Cook, 12 Wis. 335; Morrison v. Austin, 14 Wis. 601; Northrup v. Shephard, 23 Wis. 513.
The judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and the cause is remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
37 N.W. 822, 71 Wis. 576, 1888 Wisc. LEXIS 171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcconkey-v-mccraney-wis-1888.