McConico v. Pickard and Hughes, P.C.

Supreme Court of Alabama

McConico v. Pickard and Hughes, P.C.

514 So. 2d 1013, 1987 Ala. LEXIS 4533

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedSeptember 25, 1987

Docket86-841

StatusPublished

This text of 514 So. 2d 1013 (McConico v. Pickard and Hughes, P.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McConico v. Pickard and Hughes, P.C., 514 So. 2d 1013, 1987 Ala. LEXIS 4533 (Ala. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff appeals from the denial of his Rule 60(b), A.R.Civ.P., motion (on the ground of newly discovered evidence of his lawyer’s alleged conflict of interest) to vacate the summary judgment entered in favor of the defendants. We affirm on the authority of McLeod v. McLeod, 473 So.2d 1097 (Ala.Civ.App.1985).

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C.J., and JONES, SHORES, ADAMS and STEAGALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff appeals from the denial of his Rule 60(b), A.R.Civ.P., motion (on the ground of newly discovered evidence of his lawyer’s alleged conflict of interest) to vacate the summary judgment entered in favor of the defendants. We affirm on the authority of McLeod v. McLeod, 473 So.2d 1097 (Ala.Civ.App.1985).

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C.J., and JONES, SHORES, ADAMS and STEAGALL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

514 So. 2d 1013, 1987 Ala. LEXIS 4533, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcconico-v-pickard-and-hughes-pc-ala-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack