McConico v. Jim Burke Buick, Inc.

518 So. 2d 112, 1987 Ala. LEXIS 4665, 1987 WL 31817
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided December 4, 1987·No. 86-947, 86-948·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As to the statute of limitations issue, we affirm on the authority of Harrell v. Reynolds Metals Co., 495 So.2d 1381 (Ala.1986). As to the discovery issue, we affirm on the authority of Rankin v. First National Bank of Alabama, 437 So.2d 503 (Ala. 1983).

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C.J., and JONES, SHORES, ADAMS, and STEAGALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McConico v. Jim Burke Buick, Inc., 518 So. 2d 112, 1987 Ala. LEXIS 4665, 1987 WL 31817 (Ala. 1987).

518 So. 2d 112 (McConico v. Jim Burke Buick, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rankin v. First Nat. Bank of Alabama
437 So. 2d 503 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1983)
Harrell v. Reynolds Metals Co.
495 So. 2d 1381 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1986)