McConico v. Jim Burke Buick, Inc.

518 So. 2d 112, 1987 Ala. LEXIS 4665, 1987 WL 31817
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedDecember 4, 1987
Docket86-947, 86-948
StatusPublished

This text of 518 So. 2d 112 (McConico v. Jim Burke Buick, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McConico v. Jim Burke Buick, Inc., 518 So. 2d 112, 1987 Ala. LEXIS 4665, 1987 WL 31817 (Ala. 1987).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As to the statute of limitations issue, we affirm on the authority of Harrell v. Reynolds Metals Co., 495 So.2d 1381 (Ala.1986). As to the discovery issue, we affirm on the authority of Rankin v. First National Bank of Alabama, 437 So.2d 503 (Ala. 1983).

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C.J., and JONES, SHORES, ADAMS, and STEAGALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rankin v. First Nat. Bank of Alabama
437 So. 2d 503 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1983)
Harrell v. Reynolds Metals Co.
495 So. 2d 1381 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
518 So. 2d 112, 1987 Ala. LEXIS 4665, 1987 WL 31817, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcconico-v-jim-burke-buick-inc-ala-1987.