McConathy v. State

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

McConathy v. State

911 So. 2d 688, 2005 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 174, 2005 WL 858044

CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama

DecidedApril 15, 2005

Docket2021203

StatusPublished

This text of 911 So. 2d 688 (McConathy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McConathy v. State, 911 So. 2d 688, 2005 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 174, 2005 WL 858044 (Ala. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

On Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

PITTMAN, Judge.

The Alabama Supreme Court has reversed this court’s June 18, 2004, affir-mance, without opinion, of the trial court’s judgment, and it has remanded the case to this court. Ex parte McConathy, 911 So.2d 677 (Ala.2005). In compliance with the Alabama Supreme Court’s opinion, the trial court’s judgment of forfeiture is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for the entry of a judgment consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

CRAWLEY, P.J., and THOMPSON, MURDOCK, and BRYAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI