McCommon v. Spong
14 A. 260, 10 Sadler 453
This text of 14 A. 260 (McCommon v. Spong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McCommon v. Spong, 14 A. 260, 10 Sadler 453 (Pa. 1888).
Opinion
As no appeal lies in a case of this kind, we can consider nothing but the record which has been brought up by the certiorari, and as in that nothing appears which is irregular, or which is unwarranted by the act of assembly under which the court acted, we must affirm the judgment of the common pleas.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Schaeffer v. Frey
589 A.2d 752 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1991)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
14 A. 260, 10 Sadler 453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccommon-v-spong-pa-1888.