McCombs v. Suresky

240 A.D. 1009

This text of 240 A.D. 1009 (McCombs v. Suresky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCombs v. Suresky, 240 A.D. 1009 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

Order denying motion upon the minutes to set aside verdict unanimously affirmed, with costs. Order denying motion to vacate judgment and for a new trial upon the ground of newly-discovered evidence unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Tompkins, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
240 A.D. 1009, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccombs-v-suresky-nyappdiv-1933.