McCombs v. State

34 S.E. 1023, 109 Ga. 500, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 242
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 24, 1900
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 34 S.E. 1023 (McCombs v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCombs v. State, 34 S.E. 1023, 109 Ga. 500, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 242 (Ga. 1900).

Opinion

Cobb, J.

The indictment in the present case was framed' under section 233 of the Penal Code, and purported to charge-the defendant with the offense of forgery. While it alleged that she forged an order for certain described goods, it failed to allege that they were of any value. Under the ruling made in the case of Johnson v. State, ante, 268, this indictment was fatally [501]*501defective. There being no allegation that the goods were of any value, there was nothing to authorize proof of their value; and it was therefore error in the court to admit evidence going to show that the articles referred to in the order were valuable. See 2 Bish. New Crim. Pro. § 187.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kelly v. Strouse & Bros.
43 S.E. 280 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 S.E. 1023, 109 Ga. 500, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccombs-v-state-ga-1900.