McCombs v. Feeter
1 Wend. 19
This text of 1 Wend. 19 (McCombs v. Feeter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McCombs v. Feeter, 1 Wend. 19 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1828).
Opinion
By the Court,
The rule was irregularly entered. This was not a return of scire feci, which implies a personal service ; and though it might have been received as a return of nihil, authorizing the plaintiff to issue an alias and obtain a second return of nihil, he has not chosen so to consider it. The motion is granted, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. MacK
295 U.S. 480 (Supreme Court, 1935)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Wend. 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccombs-v-feeter-nysupct-1828.