McComb v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McComb v. State

815 So. 2d 776, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6376, 2002 WL 940220

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 10, 2002

DocketNo. 2D01-2167

StatusPublished

This text of 815 So. 2d 776 (McComb v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McComb v. State, 815 So. 2d 776, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6376, 2002 WL 940220 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the imposition of the minimum mandatory sentence as to count I of the conviction obtained against Arthur Kelly McComb. The sentence imposed for count IV, carrying a concealed firearm, [777]*777improperly reflects a minimum mandatory sentence. In fact, the trial court orally pronounced that the minimum mandatory term was imposed as to count III, felon in possession. In order to avoid confusion, this should be corrected on remand.

Affirmed with instructions.

GREEN, SALCINES, and KELLY, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the imposition of the minimum mandatory sentence as to count I of the conviction obtained against Arthur Kelly McComb. The sentence imposed for count IV, carrying a concealed firearm, [777]*777improperly reflects a minimum mandatory sentence. In fact, the trial court orally pronounced that the minimum mandatory term was imposed as to count III, felon in possession. In order to avoid confusion, this should be corrected on remand.

Affirmed with instructions.

GREEN, SALCINES, and KELLY, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

815 So. 2d 776, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6376, 2002 WL 940220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccomb-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.