McComb v. Hilton Heights Apartments, Inc.

43 A.D.2d 972, 352 N.Y.S.2d 226, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5707
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 19, 1974
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 43 A.D.2d 972 (McComb v. Hilton Heights Apartments, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McComb v. Hilton Heights Apartments, Inc., 43 A.D.2d 972, 352 N.Y.S.2d 226, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5707 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Opinion

In an action, inter alla, to recover damages for breach of contract, defendants Hilton Heights Apartments, Inc., Celli and Dinolfo appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 25, 1972, as denied the branch of their motion which was for a change of venue from Kings Cotinty to Monroe County. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, with $20 costs and disbursements, and said branch of the motion granted. The number of material and necessary witnesses in Monroe County clearly outnumber those in Kings County and it would serve the convenience of the preponderance of the witnesses to change the venue to Monroe County (CPLR 510, subd. 3). (See Slamin v. Whispell, 5 A D 2d 296; Cole v. Ocean Acc. é Guar. Gorp., 179 App. Div. 442; King v. Vanderbilt, 7 How. Prac. 385.) Further, a change of venue is in the interests of justice in the instant case (CPLR 510, subd. 3), because’Monroe County is the place where this transitory .action arose' (Slavin V. Whispell, supra), because several of the witnesses are officials in Monroe County and should not be kept from their duties unnecessarily (Stevens v. Bancroft, 275 App. Div. 864; Latham v. Devine, 276 App. Div. 824) and because the Trial Calendar of Monroe County is less crowded and a speedier trial can be afforded there (Commercial State Bank é Trust Go. of New York v. Bita, 4 A D 2d 674). Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Latham and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chimirri v. Evergreen America Corp.
211 A.D.2d 743 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Port Bay Associates v. Soundview Shopping Center
197 A.D.2d 848 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Jansen v. Bernhang
149 A.D.2d 468 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Wolff v. Friedman
148 A.D.2d 448 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Ray v. Beauter
90 A.D.2d 988 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
James McKinney & Son, Inc. v. Lake Placid 1980 Olympic Games, Inc.
84 A.D.2d 635 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Lundgren v. Lovejoy
82 A.D.2d 912 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Kucich v. Leibowitz
68 A.D.2d 1002 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 A.D.2d 972, 352 N.Y.S.2d 226, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccomb-v-hilton-heights-apartments-inc-nyappdiv-1974.