McComb v. Crehan
This text of 320 F. App'x 507 (McComb v. Crehan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
We have jurisdiction over this appeal, Knox v. Southwest Airlines, 124 F.3d [508]*5081103, 1106 (9th Cir.1997), and can consider the merits of defendants’ arguments, Hydride v. Hunter, 500 F.3d 978, 986 (9th Cir.2007).
Defendants did not violate McComb’s free speech and free exercise rights by preventing her from making a proselytizing graduation speech. Cole v. Oroville Union High School District, 228 F.3d 1092, 1101 (9th Cir.2000); Lassonde v. Pleasanton Unified School District, 320 F.3d 979, 983 (9th Cir.2003). Nor did they violate McComb’s right to equal protection; they did not allow other graduation speakers to proselytize.
REVERSED and REMANDED for dismissal of the claims that are the subject of this appeal.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
320 F. App'x 507, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccomb-v-crehan-ca9-2009.