McComb v. Benz Co.

92 F. Supp. 742, 1949 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1815
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana
DecidedDecember 29, 1949
DocketCiv. No. 321
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 92 F. Supp. 742 (McComb v. Benz Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Indiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McComb v. Benz Co., 92 F. Supp. 742, 1949 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1815 (S.D. Ind. 1949).

Opinion

BALTZELL, District Judge.

Special Findings of Fact

Pursuant to Rule 52 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., the Court now states its Special Findings of Fact (hereby adopting the Stipulation of Facts of the parties as part of such Special Findings of Fact), as follows:

Stipulation of Facts

It is hereby stipulated by and between the plaintiff and the defendant, through their respective attorneys, that the following facts are true and may be accepted as true without further proof for the purposes of the trial and hearing on the complaint and answer in the above-entitled cause.

That the defendant is, and at all times hereinafter mentioned was, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Indiana.

II

Defendant has at all times hereinafter mentioned maintained a slaughtering and packing plant located at the junction of Highways numbered 229 and 46, Bates-ville, Indiana, hereinafter referred to> as the plant. The plant consists of a slaughtering-and-dressing building, a hide house, a power house, a lard-rendering house, a tallow and meat-scrap storage house, and a tool house. In addition there is a platform where the hogs and cattle, all of which are purchased for slaughter from various sources within the State of Indiana, are received. There is also a system of pens and chutes, a pig pen and a barn in which the cattle are handled and fed.

The slaughtering-and-dressing building consists of a hog-killing shed, a cattle-stunning chute, the slaughtering room proper containing hog-killing equipment, an overhead crane system for the slaughtering and dressing of cattle, a sausage room, three coolers or cold-storage rooms, and a room containing the machinery and vat used in rendering tallow and pressing meat scraps.

In the plant the defendant employs, and has employed, Martin Nobbe, Leo Benz, Edmund Etter, George Lewis, and James Firsich in the production of edible meats, tallow, hides, and by-products.

III

Defendant employs six additional full-time employees, and intermittently employs one or more of the production employees on busy days, such as Saturday, in its meat market located about a mile from the plant at Batesville, Indiana. This market sells all of the edible meat products produced in the plant. The meat market also sells staple products purchased from wholesalers, including bread, cookies, crackers, cheese, canned goods, and other packaged products.

IV

In the production 6f edible meats, tallow, hides, and by-products at the plant, cattle are handled, slaughtered, and dressed, tallow is rendered, hides are cured, and byproducts are processed.

V

The handling operations include all of the activities performed by the plant employees from the time the defendant takes possession of the cattle to the time of slaughter. The handling of cattle begins at the receiving platform. They are yarded, stabled, and fed. For a period from one day to a week, they are cared 'for and rested in preparation for slaughter. Martin Nobbe is employed in this handling work approximately 6 hours a week. Additional handling work is performed in the selection and [744]*744sorting of cattle, .penning them, and placing the cattle in the stunning chute. In this additional handling work, Leo Benz, Edmund Etter, George Lewis, and James Firsich each spend from IS to 30 minutes every Tuesday and from IS to 30 minutes ■every other Wednesday.

VI

With respect to the cattle, the handling operations end and slaughtering and dressing operations begin when the animal is placed in the stunning chute. It i's stunned iby one of the employees and dropped on to the killing floor. The animal is fastened by the hind legs and partially raised by an overhead crane. The blood is drawn. The hoofs and head are severed. The carcass i's split. The carcass is fully raised and the guts are dropped into a cart or dinky. The hide is separated from the carcass and removed. The entrails are severed from the carcass and removed. The various organs are segregated from the entrails. Suet and other inedible portions are trimmed from the carcass. The carcass is halved and the halves moved into the cooler. The entrails are cleaned and stored. The suet and other meat trimmings are collected and stored. The killing floor is washed down. The hides are temporarily placed at the side of the room. When hides have been accumulated, they are given a preliminary cleaning, and conveyed to the hide house where they are weighed, spread on a pile, and salted.’ Each of the above operations is repeated on each succeeding animal in the foregoing sequence until the day’s kill is completed. The average full day’s kill for the 132-week period from January 1, 1947 through July 16, 1949 was 10.79 cattle. (See paragraph XIII below.)

VII

Leo Benz, Edmund Etter, George Lewis, and James Firsich interchangeably perform all of the operations described in paragraph VI hereof for at least 8 hours on every Tuesday and an additional 4 hours on every second Wednesday.

VIII

Either Leo Benz, George Lewis, or James Firsich spends approximately one-half hour a week in spreading on a pile and salting hides in the hide house, where the hides cure until they are picked up by the purchaser monthly.

IX

Once a week on Thursday, the suet, meat scraps, and other tallow materials are removed from storage and placed in a cart or dinky in the tallow-rendering room. The material is then elevated into a hopper-fed grinder. Here it is ground and deposited into another cart or dinky. This ground material is again elevated and dumped into a hopper-fed vat. It is then cooked until the tallow is rendered. The tallow is drawn off into metal drums for storing. The operation is repeated until all available material has been processed. Following each cooking operation, the residue is removed from the vat and placed in a press. There it is pressed into cakes. In this pressing process, additional amounts of tallow are drawn off into storage drums. The drums of tallow and the cakes of meat scraps are conveyed to the tallow and meat scrap store house. When approximately 10,000 pounds of tallow have been accumulated, it is shipped to The Proctor and Gamble Manufacturing Company at Ivorydale, Ohio.

X

George Lewis spends approximately 8 to 10 hours a week, Leo Benz spends approximately 4 to S hours a week, and James Firsich, in some workweeks, spends 4 to 5 hours in the performance of the operations described in paragraph IX hereof.

XI

Leo Benz spends approximately 10 hours a week, George Lewis and Edmund Etter spend approximately 8 hours a week, and James Firsich spends approximately 12 hours a week in performing work necessary to the general maintenance and operation of the plant, such as cleaning, repairing, and maintaining machinery and equipment, and in general work around the plant.

XII

The comparative bulk of the edible and inedible portions to the live weight of the [745]*745average beef animal slaughtered in the plant is approximately 53 per cent edible and 47 per cent inedible. Approximately 80 per cent of the inedible portion of the total animal weight is used in the production of tallow, hides, and .by-products.

XIII

During the 132-week period between January 1, 1947 and July 16, 1949, the defendant slaughtered 1,781 cattle.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rodgers v. Wright's Provisions, Inc.
310 F. Supp. 136 (D. South Carolina, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 F. Supp. 742, 1949 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1815, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccomb-v-benz-co-insd-1949.