McCollum v. State
799 So. 2d 1082, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 14888, 2001 WL 1245385
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 19, 2001
DocketNo. 2D01-2416
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 799 So. 2d 1082 (McCollum v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McCollum v. State, 799 So. 2d 1082, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 14888, 2001 WL 1245385 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
Opinion
Michael McCollum appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm without prejudice to McCollum’s right to raise the claim in a facially sufficient rule 3.800(a) motion or a properly sworn rule 3.850 motion. See Hill v. State, 754 So.2d 788 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Toney v. State
817 So. 2d 924 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
799 So. 2d 1082, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 14888, 2001 WL 1245385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccollum-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.