MCCOLLUM, THEODORE, PEOPLE v

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 29, 2011·No. KA 10-01076·Published

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

440 KA 10-01076 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, LINDLEY, GREEN, AND GORSKI, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

THEODORE MCCOLLUM, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

JONES & MORRIS, VICTOR (MICHAEL A. JONES, JR., OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

R. MICHAEL TANTILLO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, CANANDAIGUA (BRIAN D. DENNIS OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Ontario County Court (Frederick G. Reed, A.J.), dated March 23, 2010. The order denied defendant’s petition to modify the determination that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order denying his petition pursuant to Correction Law § 168-o (2) seeking to modify the prior determination that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (§ 168 et seq). “We agree with County Court that defendant failed to meet his ‘burden of proving the facts supporting the requested modification by clear and convincing evidence’ ” (People v Higgins, 55 AD3d 1303, quoting § 168-o [2]; see People v Cullen, 79 AD3d 1677).

Entered: April 29, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MCCOLLUM, THEODORE, PEOPLE v, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

MCCOLLUM, THEODORE, PEOPLE v (MCCOLLUM, THEODORE, PEOPLE v) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Cullen
79 A.D.3d 1677 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)