McCollough v. Citizens & Southern Bank

154 S.E. 267, 170 Ga. 757, 1930 Ga. LEXIS 232
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 16, 1930·No. No. 7325·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Under the decision in Sprouse v. Skinner, 155 Ga. 119, the trial judge did not err in rendering the judgment to which exception is taken. The present case is distinguished from Ullman v. Brunswick Title &c. Co., 96 Ga. 625 (24 S. E. 109), because in that case there was a mere pledge of property without any transfer of title.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Russell, G. J., who dissents, amd Gilbert, J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCollough v. Citizens & Southern Bank, 154 S.E. 267, 170 Ga. 757, 1930 Ga. LEXIS 232 (Ga. 1930).

154 S.E. 267 (McCollough v. Citizens & Southern Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hulsey v. Cotton States Fertilizer Co.
45 F.2d 388 (Fifth Circuit, 1930)