McCollough v. Citizens & Southern Bank

Supreme Court of Georgia

McCollough v. Citizens & Southern Bank

154 S.E. 267, 170 Ga. 757, 1930 Ga. LEXIS 232

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJuly 16, 1930

DocketNo. 7325

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 154 S.E. 267 (McCollough v. Citizens & Southern Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCollough v. Citizens & Southern Bank, 154 S.E. 267, 170 Ga. 757, 1930 Ga. LEXIS 232 (Ga. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Under the decision in Sprouse v. Skinner, 155 Ga. 119, the trial judge did not err in rendering the judgment to which exception is taken. The present case is distinguished from Ullman v. Brunswick Title &c. Co., 96 Ga. 625 (24 S. E. 109), because in that case there was a mere pledge of property without any transfer of title.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Russell, G. J., who dissents, amd Gilbert, J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Under the decision in Sprouse v. Skinner, 155 Ga. 119, the trial judge did not err in rendering the judgment to which exception is taken. The present case is distinguished from Ullman v. Brunswick Title &c. Co., 96 Ga. 625 (24 S. E. 109), because in that case there was a mere pledge of property without any transfer of title.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Russell, G. J., who dissents, amd Gilbert, J., disqualified.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

154 S.E. 267, 170 Ga. 757, 1930 Ga. LEXIS 232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccollough-v-citizens-southern-bank-ga-1930.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack