McColgan v. McKay
This text of 25 Ga. 631 (McColgan v. McKay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the Court.
delivering the opinion.
We think, that the motion of McColgan, the plaintiff, for leave “to open his case, and prove that the paper” “ was an acknowledgment of an indebtedness for the amount of five hundred and twenty dollars,” should have been granted; especially, as McCqlgan resisted the nonsuit, insisting that Courts have no power to grant a nonsuit against the consent of the plaintiff, and it is, at least, a very doubtful question whether he was not right in this position. See 1. Pet. R 469.
[633]*633It is almost a matter of course, to let in evidence upon a point, to save a non-suit., The practice is commended by every consideration of expediency.
We, think, then, that the Court below, erred in refusing this- motion,
Judgment reversed and case reinstated.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 Ga. 631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccolgan-v-mckay-ga-1858.