McCole v. Wynne
This text of 12 Ind. 317 (McCole v. Wynne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellees, who were the plaintiffs, sued Me Cole on a promissory note, for the payment of 541 dollars. Issues, properly made, were submitted to the Court for trial. Finding for the plaintiff. Each party moved for a new trial, and each motion was overruled. Judgment on the finding of the Gourt. The defendant appeals to this Court, and assigns for error the refusal to [318]*318grant him a new trial. This being the only error of which the appellant complains, and the evidence given on the trial not being in the record, the judgment must be affirmed; because we have often decided that when the evidence is not made a part of the record, the opinion of. the Court below in overruling a motion for a new trial, will not be reviewed. 8 Ind. R. 470, 499.—11 id. 260.
The judgment is affirmed with 6 per cent, damages and costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 Ind. 317, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccole-v-wynne-ind-1859.