McCoggle v. State

939 So. 2d 173, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 16443, 2006 WL 2818518
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 4, 2006
DocketNo. 4D06-1730
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 939 So. 2d 173 (McCoggle v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCoggle v. State, 939 So. 2d 173, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 16443, 2006 WL 2818518 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to appellant seeking relief pursuant to rule 3.800(a), or to the administrative remedies available through the Department of Corrections, or, after exhausting his administrative remedies, to filing a petition for writ of mandamus if no relief is forthcoming.

STONE, WARNER, and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blanding v. State
939 So. 2d 173 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
939 So. 2d 173, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 16443, 2006 WL 2818518, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccoggle-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.