McCoggle v. State

810 So. 2d 1016, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2369, 2002 WL 342066
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 6, 2002
DocketNo. 4D01-3649
StatusPublished

This text of 810 So. 2d 1016 (McCoggle v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCoggle v. State, 810 So. 2d 1016, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2369, 2002 WL 342066 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the circuit court’s order denying Appellant’s motion to vacate posLcon-vietion orders, which was based on a claim that the circuit court lacked jurisdiction to rule on the post-conviction matters. The mandate in the direct appeal of Appellant’s conviction and sentence was issued on May 24, 1996. Appellant’s copy of the mandate mistakenly bears the date the copy was made — January 26, 2001 — rather than the actual issuance date of the mandate. The circuit court, therefore, had jurisdiction to enter its order denying Appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief, which was filed after the date the mandate was issued.

STONE, SHAHOOD, and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
810 So. 2d 1016, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2369, 2002 WL 342066, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccoggle-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.