McCoach v. Bamberger

Third Circuit

McCoach v. Bamberger

161 F. 90, 88 C.C.A. 254, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 4317

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedMarch 9, 1908

DocketNo. 9

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 161 F. 90 (McCoach v. Bamberger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCoach v. Bamberger, 161 F. 90, 88 C.C.A. 254, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 4317 (3d Cir. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Counsel for both parties agreeing that the only question sought to be raised in this case is that which was presented in the cases of McCoach v. Trust Co. and McCoach v. Norris, 142 Fed. 120, 73 C. C. A. 610, we need only say that, as there has not in the meantime been any contrary decision of that question by the Supreme Court, we adhere to the position taken by us in the cases referred to, and accordingly the judgment in the present case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Counsel for both parties agreeing that the only question sought to be raised in this case is that which was presented in the cases of McCoach v. Trust Co. and McCoach v. Norris, 142 Fed. 120, 73 C. C. A. 610, we need only say that, as there has not in the meantime been any contrary decision of that question by the Supreme Court, we adhere to the position taken by us in the cases referred to, and accordingly the judgment in the present case is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

161 F. 90, 88 C.C.A. 254, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 4317, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccoach-v-bamberger-ca3-1908.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack