McCoach v. Bamberger

Third Circuit

McCoach v. Bamberger

161 F. 90, 88 C.C.A. 254, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 4317

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided March 9, 1908·No. No. 9·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Counsel for both parties agreeing that the only question sought to be raised in this case is that which was presented in the cases of McCoach v. Trust Co. and McCoach v. Norris, 142 Fed. 120, 73 C. C. A. 610, we need only say that, as there has not in the meantime been any contrary decision of that question by the Supreme Court, we adhere to the position taken by us in the cases referred to, and accordingly the judgment in the present case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Counsel for both parties agreeing that the only question sought to be raised in this case is that which was presented in the cases of McCoach v. Trust Co. and McCoach v. Norris, 142 Fed. 120, 73 C. C. A. 610, we need only say that, as there has not in the meantime been any contrary decision of that question by the Supreme Court, we adhere to the position taken by us in the cases referred to, and accordingly the judgment in the present case is affirmed.

McCoach v. Bamberger, 161 F. 90, 88 C.C.A. 254, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 4317 (3d Cir. 1908).

Pincite

161 F. 90 (McCoach v. Bamberger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related