Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/McCluster v. State

McCluster v. State

872 So. 2d 447, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6715, 2004 WL 1074504
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 14, 2004
DocketNo. 2D03-5233
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 872 So. 2d 447 (McCluster v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCluster v. State, 872 So. 2d 447, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6715, 2004 WL 1074504 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order of the trial court without prejudice to any right appellant might have to file a facially sufficient motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), or a timely facially sufficient motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, raising the claim that the written sentences in counts three and four are illegal because they do not comport with the oral pronouncement.

NORTHCUTT, KELLY and VILLANTI, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lyell v. State
872 So. 2d 447 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
872 So. 2d 447, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6715, 2004 WL 1074504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccluster-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.