McClurg v. Dhume

139 N.E.2d 365, 74 Ohio Law. Abs. 21, 1954 Ohio App. LEXIS 774
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 7, 1954
DocketNo. 5196
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 139 N.E.2d 365 (McClurg v. Dhume) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McClurg v. Dhume, 139 N.E.2d 365, 74 Ohio Law. Abs. 21, 1954 Ohio App. LEXIS 774 (Ohio Ct. App. 1954).

Opinion

OPINION

By THE COURT.

Submitted on motion of the defendant-appellee seeking an order dismissing the appeal for the reason that the order appealed from is not a final order. The record discloses that the order appealed from is one sustaining a demurrer to the petition. No order of dismissal has been entered. Therefore, there is no final order, as the ruling on the demurrer does not terminate the action. See Collins v. Cab Co., 157 Oh St 311. Motion sustained.

WISEMAN, PJ, MILLER and HORNBECK, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Steele v. True Temper Corp.
174 N.E.2d 298 (Ashtabula County Court of Common Pleas, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 N.E.2d 365, 74 Ohio Law. Abs. 21, 1954 Ohio App. LEXIS 774, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcclurg-v-dhume-ohioctapp-1954.