McClure v. Traffic Truck Sales Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

McClure v. Traffic Truck Sales Co.

105 So. 846, 90 Fla. 356

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 20, 1925·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, and being of the opinion that this case is controlled by Santa Rosa Co. v. Trobuck, 77 Fla. 86, 80 So. 748, and not by Brown v. Booth, 73 Fla. 67; 74 So. 212, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, and being of the opinion that this case is controlled by Santa Rosa Co. v. Trobuck, 77 Fla. 86, 80 So. 748, and not by Brown v. Booth, 73 Fla. 67; 74 So. 212, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur.

McClure v. Traffic Truck Sales Co., 105 So. 846, 90 Fla. 356 (Fla. 1925).

Pincite

105 So. 846 (McClure v. Traffic Truck Sales Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related