McClure v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

McClure v. State

1923 OK CR 155, 215 P. 795, 24 Okla. Crim. 48, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 238

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 15, 1923

DocketNo. A-4230.

StatusPublished

This text of 1923 OK CR 155 (McClure v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McClure v. State, 1923 OK CR 155, 215 P. 795, 24 Okla. Crim. 48, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 238 (Okla. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of MeCurtain county, on the 5th day of January, 1922, of the offense of pointing a gun at another, and sentenced to pay a fine of $50' and to be imprisoned in the county jail for a period of 30 days.

The appeal has been pending in this court since the 6th day of March, 1922. No brief has been filed in behalf of plaintiff in error, and no appearances made to orally argue the cause at the time same was submitted.

The court has examined the pleadings, instructions, judgment, and sentence, and can find no prejudicial error sufficient to authorize a reversal of the judgment.

The same is therefore affirmed under rule 9 of this court (12 Okla. Cr. viii, 165 Pac. x).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of MeCurtain county, on the 5th day of January, 1922, of the offense of pointing a gun at another, and sentenced to pay a fine of $50' and to be imprisoned in the county jail for a period of 30 days.

The appeal has been pending in this court since the 6th day of March, 1922. No brief has been filed in behalf of plaintiff in error, and no appearances made to orally argue the cause at the time same was submitted.

The court has examined the pleadings, instructions, judgment, and sentence, and can find no prejudicial error sufficient to authorize a reversal of the judgment.

The same is therefore affirmed under rule 9 of this court (12 Okla. Cr. viii, 165 Pac. x).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1923 OK CR 155, 215 P. 795, 24 Okla. Crim. 48, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcclure-v-state-oklacrimapp-1923.