McClure v. State

546 P.2d 232, 92 Nev. 110, 1976 Nev. LEXIS 531
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided February 20, 1976·No. No. 8323·Published

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

After a jury trial, appellant stands convicted of second degree murder for the killing of Betty Alice McClure. Here, [111] appellant contends the trial court erred in refusing a challenge for cause to a juror who was later excused peremptorily. We disagree.

After exhausting all peremptory challenges, the jury contained no one whom appellant had challenged for cause. Under such circumstances, we need not determine whether it was error for the trial court to deny the cause challenge. Odom v. State, 91 Nev. 473, 538 P.2d 167 (1975); Mears v. State, 83 Nev. 3, 422 P.2d 230 (1967).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McClure v. State, 546 P.2d 232, 92 Nev. 110, 1976 Nev. LEXIS 531 (Neb. 1976).

546 P.2d 232 (McClure v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mears v. State
422 P.2d 230 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1967)
Odom v. State
538 P.2d 167 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1975)