McClure v. State
This text of 546 P.2d 232 (McClure v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
After a jury trial, appellant stands convicted of second degree murder for the killing of Betty Alice McClure. Here, [111]*111appellant contends the trial court erred in refusing a challenge for cause to a juror who was later excused peremptorily. We disagree.
After exhausting all peremptory challenges, the jury contained no one whom appellant had challenged for cause. Under such circumstances, we need not determine whether it was error for the trial court to deny the cause challenge. Odom v. State, 91 Nev. 473, 538 P.2d 167 (1975); Mears v. State, 83 Nev. 3, 422 P.2d 230 (1967).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
546 P.2d 232, 92 Nev. 110, 1976 Nev. LEXIS 531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcclure-v-state-nev-1976.