McClure v. State

103 S.E. 807, 25 Ga. App. 549, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 71
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 28, 1920
Docket11640
StatusPublished

This text of 103 S.E. 807 (McClure v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McClure v. State, 103 S.E. 807, 25 Ga. App. 549, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 71 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The defendant was indicted for assault with intent to murder, and was convicted of the offense of assault and battery. There is some evidence to support the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge.

The exception to the court’s failure to charge upon the law of circumstantial evidence is without merit, since the conviction of the defendant was not wholly dependent upon circumstantial evidence, and there was no timely request for such a charge.

The other exception to the charge of the court is without merit. ■ Eor no reason assigned was it error to overrule the motion for a new. trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 S.E. 807, 25 Ga. App. 549, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 71, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcclure-v-state-gactapp-1920.