McClure v. State
768 So. 2d 535, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12557, 2000 WL 1433934
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 29, 2000·No. No. 2D00-3442·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s denial of Joseph McClure’s motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Mr. McClure himself has correctly determined that his claim must be pursued under Rule 3.850. Our affirmance is without prejudice to such a claim. We express no opinion concerning the merits of any such claim.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McClure v. State, 768 So. 2d 535, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12557, 2000 WL 1433934 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
768 So. 2d 535 (McClure v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ali Ghahramani, Md v. Pablo Guzman, Md
768 So. 2d 535 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)