McClure v. State
768 So. 2d 535, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12557, 2000 WL 1433934
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 29, 2000
DocketNo. 2D00-3442
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 768 So. 2d 535 (McClure v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McClure v. State, 768 So. 2d 535, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12557, 2000 WL 1433934 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s denial of Joseph McClure’s motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Mr. McClure himself has correctly determined that his claim must be pursued under Rule 3.850. Our affirmance is without prejudice to such a claim. We express no opinion concerning the merits of any such claim.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ali Ghahramani, Md v. Pablo Guzman, Md
768 So. 2d 535 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
768 So. 2d 535, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12557, 2000 WL 1433934, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcclure-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.