McClure v. Ingram

1916 OK 72, 154 P. 575, 54 Okla. 741, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 1061
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided January 18, 1916·No. 6367·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

BRETT, C.

This cause was duly submitted in this court Decembér 6, 1915. On November 9, 1915, the plaintiff in error filed her brief. The defendant in error has filed no brief, and assigns no reason for his failure to do so. The contention of plaintiff in error seems to be reasonably supported by the authorities cited in her brief. And under the authority of Midland Elevator Co. v. Harrah, 44 Okla. 154, 143 Pac. 1168, and the authorities therein cited, we recommend that the judgment be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McClure v. Ingram, 1916 OK 72, 154 P. 575, 54 Okla. 741, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 1061 (Okla. 1916).

1916 OK 72 (McClure v. Ingram) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bradley v. Morris
1923 OK 604 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)
Adams v. Butler
1923 OK 597 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)