McClung v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

McClung v. State

10 S.E.2d 303, 62 Ga. App. 892, 1940 Ga. App. LEXIS 466

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 9, 1940

Docket28245.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 10 S.E.2d 303 (McClung v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McClung v. State, 10 S.E.2d 303, 62 Ga. App. 892, 1940 Ga. App. LEXIS 466 (Ga. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Guerry, J.

1. Where it was shown that a defendant, without provocation, used obscene and vulgar language in the presence of a female, it was not error to fail to give in charge to the jury Code § 26-6303, in its entirety. This is true although the language used was spoken to, as well as in the presence of, the female. It was not communicated to her by writing or printing.

2. A person who calls a female on the telephone, and in speaking to her on the telephone uses obscene and vulg'ar language, is guilty of using such language in her presence, and may be convicted under the section above referred to, if his identity is sufficiently established.

*893 Decided April 9, 1940. Rehearing denied July 30, 1940. Luke Arnold, for plaintiff in error. Bond Almand, solicitor, John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, J. W. LeGraw, contra.

3. The jury may convict the accused if his guilt is sufficiently established, notwithstanding proof of good character.

•4. The value of testimony offered to establish an alibi is for the jury and the trial judge. The evidence supported the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI