McClung v. McClung

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McClung v. McClung

864 So. 2d 1122, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19254, 2003 WL 22970863

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 19, 2003·No. No. 5D02-2328·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PLEUS, J.

We have examined the points raised by the appellants and conclude that, given that all payments due under the parties’ settlement agreement have been made in accordance with said agreement, the stipulated final judgment adopting and enforcing the terms of the settlement agreement should be affirmed. See Paulucci v. General Dynamics Corp., 842 So.2d 797 (Fla.2003); Nagymihaly v. Zipes, 353 So.2d 943 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PLEUS, J.

We have examined the points raised by the appellants and conclude that, given that all payments due under the parties’ settlement agreement have been made in accordance with said agreement, the stipulated final judgment adopting and enforcing the terms of the settlement agreement should be affirmed. See Paulucci v. General Dynamics Corp., 842 So.2d 797 (Fla.2003); Nagymihaly v. Zipes, 353 So.2d 943 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

McClung v. McClung, 864 So. 2d 1122, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19254, 2003 WL 22970863 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

864 So. 2d 1122 (McClung v. McClung) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related