McClung Drug Co. v. City Realty & Investment Co.

111 A. 926, 92 N.J. Eq. 237, 7 Stock. 237, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 320
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 21, 1920·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Baekes.

For affirmance—The Ci-iief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Katzenbacii, White, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, Aokerson—14. For reversal—None

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McClung Drug Co. v. City Realty & Investment Co., 111 A. 926, 92 N.J. Eq. 237, 7 Stock. 237, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 320 (N.J. 1920).

111 A. 926 (McClung Drug Co. v. City Realty & Investment Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sutton v. Lienau
542 A.2d 473 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1988)
Matlack v. Arend
63 A.2d 812 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)
Gutch v. Meccia
60 A.2d 649 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1948)
Andreula v. Slovak Gymnastic, C., No. 223
47 A.2d 878 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1946)