McClung Drug Co. v. City Realty & Investment Co.

111 A. 926, 92 N.J. Eq. 237, 7 Stock. 237, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 320
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedOctober 21, 1920
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 111 A. 926 (McClung Drug Co. v. City Realty & Investment Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McClung Drug Co. v. City Realty & Investment Co., 111 A. 926, 92 N.J. Eq. 237, 7 Stock. 237, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 320 (N.J. 1920).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Baekes.

For affirmance—The Ci-iief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Katzenbacii, White, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, Aokerson—14. For reversal—None

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sutton v. Lienau
542 A.2d 473 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1988)
Matlack v. Arend
63 A.2d 812 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)
Gutch v. Meccia
60 A.2d 649 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1948)
Andreula v. Slovak Gymnastic, C., No. 223
47 A.2d 878 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
111 A. 926, 92 N.J. Eq. 237, 7 Stock. 237, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcclung-drug-co-v-city-realty-investment-co-nj-1920.