McCloud v. Wainwright

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McCloud v. Wainwright

359 So. 2d 10, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15495

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 9, 1978

DocketNo. 75-1891

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 359 So. 2d 10 (McCloud v. Wainwright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCloud v. Wainwright, 359 So. 2d 10, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15495 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The question on appeal is whether the judgment and sentence should be reversed and a new trial ordered because the court allowed the introduction into evidence of a confession without first having specifically found it to have been voluntarily and freely given. A hearing was held to determine the voluntariness of the confession and the Appellant testified he was coerced. The court denied his objection to the admission of the confession but the judge did not say he found the confession to have been freely and voluntarily given as is required in McDole v. State, 283 So.2d 553 (Fla.1973); Wilson v. State, 304 So.2d 119 (Fla.1974); Sims v. State of Georgia, 385 U.S. 538, 87 S.Ct. 639, 17 L.Ed.2d 593 (1967); Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368, 84 S.Ct. 1774, 12 [11]*11L.Ed.2d 908 (1964); Land v. State, 293 So.2d 704 (Fla.1974); Danahey v. State, 298 So.2d 444 (Fla. 4 DCA 1974).

REVERSED and REMANDED for new trial, including a hearing and proper order on Appellant’s objection to the introduction of the alleged confession.

CROSS, DOWNEY and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The question on appeal is whether the judgment and sentence should be reversed and a new trial ordered because the court allowed the introduction into evidence of a confession without first having specifically found it to have been voluntarily and freely given. A hearing was held to determine the voluntariness of the confession and the Appellant testified he was coerced. The court denied his objection to the admission of the confession but the judge did not say he found the confession to have been freely and voluntarily given as is required in McDole v. State, 283 So.2d 553 (Fla.1973); Wilson v. State, 304 So.2d 119 (Fla.1974); Sims v. State of Georgia, 385 U.S. 538, 87 S.Ct. 639, 17 L.Ed.2d 593 (1967); Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368, 84 S.Ct. 1774, 12 [11]*11L.Ed.2d 908 (1964); Land v. State, 293 So.2d 704 (Fla.1974); Danahey v. State, 298 So.2d 444 (Fla. 4 DCA 1974).

REVERSED and REMANDED for new trial, including a hearing and proper order on Appellant’s objection to the introduction of the alleged confession.

CROSS, DOWNEY and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

359 So. 2d 10, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccloud-v-wainwright-fladistctapp-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack