McCloud v. State

53 So. 3d 1206, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1568, 2011 WL 470059
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 11, 2011·No. No. 5D09-3179·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

[1207]*1207 ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND FOR WRITTEN OPINION

PER CURIAM.

We grant Stanley McCloud’s motion for rehearing and for written opinion, withdraw our previous per curiam affirmance dated December 14, 2010, and substitute the following opinion in its place.

AFFIRMED. See Salonko v. State, 42 So.3d 801 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010); Barros-Dias v. State, 41 So.3d 370 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010); Singh v. State, 36 So.3d 848 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

PALMER, TORPY and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCloud v. State, 53 So. 3d 1206, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1568, 2011 WL 470059 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

53 So. 3d 1206 (McCloud v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stanley McCloud v. State of Florida
209 So. 3d 534 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2017)
McCloud v. State
139 So. 3d 474 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)