McCloud v. Funaiock

Fourth Circuit

McCloud v. Funaiock

674 F. App'x 321

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 27, 2017·No. No. 16-1951·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael McCloud appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil action with prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2) and taxing costs. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See McCloud v. Funaiock, No. 4:15-cv-00005-JAG-LRL (E.D. Va. July 1, 2016; June 20, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael McCloud appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil action with prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2) and taxing costs. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See McCloud v. Funaiock, No. 4:15-cv-00005-JAG-LRL (E.D. Va. July 1, 2016; June 20, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

McCloud v. Funaiock, 674 F. App'x 321 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

674 F. App'x 321 (McCloud v. Funaiock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.