McCloud v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

McCloud v. Coughlin

102 A.D.2d 854, 476 N.Y.S.2d 630, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19047

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 11, 1984

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 102 A.D.2d 854 (McCloud v. Coughlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCloud v. Coughlin, 102 A.D.2d 854, 476 N.Y.S.2d 630, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19047 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a CPLR article 78 proceeding to review a determination of the Superintendent of the Green Haven Correctional Facility penalizing petitioner for an assault on another inmate, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Palella, J.), dated April 21, 1983, which dismissed the petition. 11 Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. 11 Administrative review of the Superintendent’s determination by the New York State Commissioner of Correctional Services was available (see 7 NYCRR 254.8). Petitioner not having exhausted his administrative remedies, the petition was properly dismissed by Special Term (see Matter of Patterson v Smith, 53 NY2d 98; Matter of Hall v LeFevre, 84 AD2d 622, mot for lv to app den 55 NY2d 603; Matter of Buxton v Winch, 78 AD2d 758, mot for lv to app den 53 NY2d 601). Mollen, P. J., Titone, Mangano and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a CPLR article 78 proceeding to review a determination of the Superintendent of the Green Haven Correctional Facility penalizing petitioner for an assault on another inmate, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Palella, J.), dated April 21, 1983, which dismissed the petition. 11 Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. 11 Administrative review of the Superintendent’s determination by the New York State Commissioner of Correctional Services was available (see 7 NYCRR 254.8). Petitioner not having exhausted his administrative remedies, the petition was properly dismissed by Special Term (see Matter of Patterson v Smith, 53 NY2d 98; Matter of Hall v LeFevre, 84 AD2d 622, mot for lv to app den 55 NY2d 603; Matter of Buxton v Winch, 78 AD2d 758, mot for lv to app den 53 NY2d 601). Mollen, P. J., Titone, Mangano and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

102 A.D.2d 854, 476 N.Y.S.2d 630, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19047, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccloud-v-coughlin-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack