McCloskey v. Sweeney
4 P. 943, 66 Cal. 53, 1884 Cal. LEXIS 681
Opinion
In the action J ames McCloskey, Margaret Sweeney, Mary Sweeney and James Sweeney, the defendant last named—an infant over the age of fourteen years—was not served with process. The infant was not authorized to nominate an attorney. Nor does the court have power to appoint a guardian ad litem to appear for the infant until after summons has been served on the infant. (C. C. P. § 373 ; Johnston v. S. F. S. Union, 63 Cal. 554.)
Judgment and order reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial.
Ross, J., and McKee, J., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McCloskey v. Sweeney, 4 P. 943, 66 Cal. 53, 1884 Cal. LEXIS 681 (Cal. 1884).
4 P. 943 (McCloskey v. Sweeney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Weisfeld v. Superior Court
242 P.2d 29 (California Court of Appeal, 1952)
Brewer v. Brewer
84 S.W.2d 1022 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1933)
Akley v. Bassett
209 P. 576 (California Supreme Court, 1922)
Phelps v. Heaton
82 N.W. 990 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1900)
Redmond v. Peterson
36 P. 923 (California Supreme Court, 1894)