McCloghrie v. B.E. Rock Corp.

262 A.D.2d 240, 693 N.Y.S.2d 531, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7743
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 29, 1999
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 262 A.D.2d 240 (McCloghrie v. B.E. Rock Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCloghrie v. B.E. Rock Corp., 262 A.D.2d 240, 693 N.Y.S.2d 531, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7743 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.), entered May 6, 1998, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by appellants’ brief, granted defendants-respondents’ motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We agree that the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur does not apply to plaintiffs fall in this instance, in light of plaintiffs failure to identify the instrumentality that caused her fall. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Mazzarelli, Rubin, Andrias and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shaw v. Bronfman
284 A.D.2d 267 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
262 A.D.2d 240, 693 N.Y.S.2d 531, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccloghrie-v-be-rock-corp-nyappdiv-1999.