McClinton v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 27, 2006·No. 06-6128·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6128

DAVID CHARLES MCCLINTON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; ALBERTO R. GONZALES; W. F. DALIUS, Warden at FCI Butner-Medium,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:90-cr-17-S; 5:04-hc-00983-FL)

Submitted: July 17, 2006 Decided: July 27, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Charles McClinton, Appellant Pro Se. Steve R. Matheny, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

David Charles McClinton, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. McClinton v. United States, No. 5:04-hc-00983-

FL (E.D.N.C. Dec. 22, 2005). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McClinton v. United States, (4th Cir. 2006).

McClinton v. United States (McClinton v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241