McClinton v. United States
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6128
DAVID CHARLES MCCLINTON,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; ALBERTO R. GONZALES; W. F. DALIUS, Warden at FCI Butner-Medium,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:90-cr-17-S; 5:04-hc-00983-FL)
Submitted: July 17, 2006 Decided: July 27, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Charles McClinton, Appellant Pro Se. Steve R. Matheny, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
David Charles McClinton, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. McClinton v. United States, No. 5:04-hc-00983-
FL (E.D.N.C. Dec. 22, 2005). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McClinton v. United States (McClinton v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.