McClinton v. State

230 S.W.3d 658, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1162
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 21, 2007
DocketED 88053
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 230 S.W.3d 658 (McClinton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McClinton v. State, 230 S.W.3d 658, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1162 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant Melvin G. McClinton appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief motion for ineffective assistance of counsel without an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Songer v. Willingham
230 S.W.3d 658 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
230 S.W.3d 658, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcclinton-v-state-moctapp-2007.