McClinton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McClinton v. State

881 So. 2d 652, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11791, 2004 WL 1799844

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 13, 2004

DocketNo. 5D03-3743

StatusPublished

This text of 881 So. 2d 652 (McClinton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McClinton v. State, 881 So. 2d 652, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11791, 2004 WL 1799844 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

GRIFFIN, J.

James A. McClinton [“McClinton”] appeals pro se the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief. In 2001, McClinton had been charged by amended information with second-degree murder with a weapon. After a jury found him guilty as charged, he was sentenced to life imprisonment. We find no merit in any of the several post-conviction issues he has raised.

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying McClinton’s motion for appointment of counsel for the post-conviction evidentiary hearing. There is no right to counsel in post-conviction proceedings and the issues involved did not require the help of counsel to develop.

McClinton did not demonstrate deficient performance of trial counsel for failure to call a witness, Tony Frazier. Counsel testified that Tony Frazier repeatedly denied being present during the incident. Nor did the trial court err in summarily denying the claims in the motion asserting that counsel was ineffective [653]*653for failure to impeach the medical examiner’s testimony or for failure to introduce evidence regarding the victim’s alleged intoxication as she reported to multiple persons who came to her aid that McClinton had hit her with a “two-by-four.” These claims were conclusively refuted by the record. Finally, the trial court correctly summarily denied McClinton’s claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge the State’s peremptory strike of an African-American juror. This claim was both facially insufficient and conclusively refuted by the record.

AFFIRMED.

THOMPSON and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GRIFFIN, J.

James A. McClinton [“McClinton”] appeals pro se the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief. In 2001, McClinton had been charged by amended information with second-degree murder with a weapon. After a jury found him guilty as charged, he was sentenced to life imprisonment. We find no merit in any of the several post-conviction issues he has raised.

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying McClinton’s motion for appointment of counsel for the post-conviction evidentiary hearing. There is no right to counsel in post-conviction proceedings and the issues involved did not require the help of counsel to develop.

McClinton did not demonstrate deficient performance of trial counsel for failure to call a witness, Tony Frazier. Counsel testified that Tony Frazier repeatedly denied being present during the incident. Nor did the trial court err in summarily denying the claims in the motion asserting that counsel was ineffective [653]*653for failure to impeach the medical examiner’s testimony or for failure to introduce evidence regarding the victim’s alleged intoxication as she reported to multiple persons who came to her aid that McClinton had hit her with a “two-by-four.” These claims were conclusively refuted by the record. Finally, the trial court correctly summarily denied McClinton’s claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge the State’s peremptory strike of an African-American juror. This claim was both facially insufficient and conclusively refuted by the record.

AFFIRMED.

THOMPSON and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

881 So. 2d 652, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11791, 2004 WL 1799844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcclinton-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.