McClinton v. State

576 So. 2d 924, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2753, 1991 WL 42703
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 27, 1991
DocketNo. 90-304
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 576 So. 2d 924 (McClinton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McClinton v. State, 576 So. 2d 924, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2753, 1991 WL 42703 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

SHIVERS, Chief Judge.

This appeal is from the revocation of McClinton’s probation and his resultant sentence. Because the trial judge did not enter a written order reciting which probation conditions were violated, we reverse the probation revocation and remand for the entry of an amended written order specifying the conditions of probation which the trial court found McClinton violated. Clark v. State, 510 So.2d 1202 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). Only then will the revocation and sentence be ripe for review because the trial judge also did not orally announce at the revocation hearing the specific conditions violated.

ERVIN, J., and WENTWORTH, Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hawthorne v. State
583 So. 2d 425 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
576 So. 2d 924, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2753, 1991 WL 42703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcclinton-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.