McClintock v. Sweitzer
37 N.E.2d 49, 138 Ohio St. 527, 138 Ohio St. (N.S.) 527, 21 Ohio Op. 440, 1941 Ohio LEXIS 516
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McClintock v. Sweitzer. Read the opinion of the Court — 138 Ohio St. 324 →
Opinion
It appearing that the judges of the court are equally divided in opinion as to the merits of this case (one judge not participating) and are for that reason unable to agree upon a judgment, and the entry of that fact constituting an affirmance of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, it is ordered that the judgment be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McClintock v. Sweitzer, 37 N.E.2d 49, 138 Ohio St. 527, 138 Ohio St. (N.S.) 527, 21 Ohio Op. 440, 1941 Ohio LEXIS 516 (Ohio 1941).
37 N.E.2d 49 (McClintock v. Sweitzer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McClintock v. Sweitzer
34 N.E.2d 781 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1941)