McClintock v. City of Pawtucket

180 F. 320, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5474
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island·Decided July 26, 1910·No. No. 952·Published

Opinion

BROWN, District Judge.

This is a motion for leave to file a bill in the nature of a bill of review. The original bill was dismissed in accordance with the mandate of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. ’ .

The case relates to the Glover patent, No. 559,522, for sewage apparatus. The prior decisions upon this patent are American Sewage Disposal Co. v. City of Pawtucket (C. C.) 132 Fed. 35, 138 Fed. 811, 71 C. C. A. 177, and 146 Fed. 753, 77 C. C. A. 243. The latter opinion shows that the appellant applied to the Circuit Court of Appeals for permission to apply to the Circuit Court for leave to reopen the case, and that that petition was denied. The present motion was not preceded by an application to the Circuit Court of Appeals for permission to apply to this court. Under the circumstances this court is without power to grant the complainant’s motion. Southard et al. v. Russell, 16 How. 547, 570, 14 L. Ed. 1052; Kingsbury v. Buckner, 134 U. S. 650, 670, 672, 10 Sup. Ct. 638, 33 L. Ed. 1047; In re Potts, 166 U. S. 263, 17 Sup. Ct. 520, 41 L. Ed. 994.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McClintock v. City of Pawtucket, 180 F. 320, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5474 (circtdri 1910).

180 F. 320 (McClintock v. City of Pawtucket) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Southard v. Russell
57 U.S. 547 (Supreme Court, 1854)
Kingsbury v. Buckner
134 U.S. 650 (Supreme Court, 1890)
In Re Potts
166 U.S. 263 (Supreme Court, 1897)
American Sewage Disposal Co. v. City of Pawtucket
132 F. 35 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island, 1904)