McClintic-Marshall Construction Co. v. Easton Trust Co.
94 A. 246, 248 Pa. 584, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 619
Opinion
No cause has been shown why the answer of the court below to defendant’s tenth request for a finding of fact, or the court’s own ‘fourteenth finding, ought to be disturbed. On these findings of fact the appeal is dismissed.
Decree affirmed at appellant’s costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McClintic-Marshall Construction Co. v. Easton Trust Co., 94 A. 246, 248 Pa. 584, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 619 (Pa. 1915).
94 A. 246 (McClintic-Marshall Construction Co. v. Easton Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Hawley Down Draft Furnace Co.
256 F. 555 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1919)