MCCLERNON v. WEDDING
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
JAMES MCCLERNON, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) No. 1:20-cv-02322-JPH-DML ) DAVE WEDDING, ) ) Respondent. )
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT, VACATING ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, AND DISMISSING ACTION AS MOOT
On March 9, 2022, the Court granted James McClernon's petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Dkt. 13. On April 5, 2022, the respondent filed a motion to alter or amend judgment. Dkt. 16. The petitioner did not respond. On August 13, 2022, counsel for the petitioner filed a motion to dismiss informing the Court that Mr. McClernon died on July 27, 2022 and requesting that this habeas case be dismissed as moot. Dkt. 17. The respondent did not respond. Mr. McClernon's death renders this case moot because there is no meaningful relief the Court can grant him. McClendon v. Trigg, 79 F.3d 557, 558 (7th Cir. 1996) (petitioner's death mooted habeas petition and required district court to vacate its judgment). When a petition for a writ of habeas corpus becomes moot while the losing party's motion to alter or amend the judgment or appeal is pending, the Supreme Court requires that the district court's merits decision be vacated, and the petition be dismissed as moot. See Powell v. Indiana Parole Bd., No. 21-2167, 2022 WL 2208878, at *1 (7th Cir. June 21, 2022) (citing United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36 (1950)). Therefore, the motion to dismiss, dkt. [17], and the motion to alter or amend judgment, dkt. [16], are granted to the extent that the Court's merits decision, dkt. [13], and final judgment dkt. [14], are vacated and the petition is dismissed as moot. Final judgment consistent with this Order shall now enter. SO ORDERED. Date: 10/6/2022
Sjamnu Patnaik Hanbore James Patrick Hanlon United States District Judge Southern District of Indiana Distribution: Michael K. Ausbrook mausbrook@gmail.com Jesse R. Drum INDIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL jesse.drum@atg.in.gov
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
MCCLERNON v. WEDDING (MCCLERNON v. WEDDING) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.