McClenton v. State
281 S.W.3d 361, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 562, 2009 WL 1117409
Opinion
ORDER
Robert McClenton appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief. On appeal, McClenton claims that the motion court erred in denying his motion because he established that his trial counsel failed to provide effective assistance. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McClenton v. State, 281 S.W.3d 361, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 562, 2009 WL 1117409 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
281 S.W.3d 361 (McClenton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Peters v. State
281 S.W.3d 361 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)