McClenton v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

McClenton v. State

281 S.W.3d 361, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 562, 2009 WL 1117409

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 28, 2009

DocketWD 69139

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 281 S.W.3d 361 (McClenton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McClenton v. State, 281 S.W.3d 361, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 562, 2009 WL 1117409 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Robert McClenton appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief. On appeal, McClenton claims that the motion court erred in denying his motion because he established that his trial counsel failed to provide effective assistance. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Robert McClenton appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief. On appeal, McClenton claims that the motion court erred in denying his motion because he established that his trial counsel failed to provide effective assistance. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

281 S.W.3d 361, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 562, 2009 WL 1117409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcclenton-v-state-moctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack