McClendon v. State

45 S.W.2d 585, 119 Tex. Crim. 286, 1932 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 74
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 6, 1932
DocketNo. 14666
StatusPublished

This text of 45 S.W.2d 585 (McClendon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McClendon v. State, 45 S.W.2d 585, 119 Tex. Crim. 286, 1932 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 74 (Tex. 1932).

Opinion

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for possessing equipment for the manufacture of intoxicating liquor, punishment being one year in the penitentiary.

There appears in the transcript two notices of appeal, one dated April 20, 1931, the other dated April 29, 1931. The statement of facts was filed in the trial court more than ninety days after the last notice of appeal was entered. The statement of facts is not entitled to consideration. See subdivision 5, article 760, C. C. P. (1925); Bailey v. State, 104 Texas Crim. Rep., 150, 282 S. W., 804; Clark v. State, 105 Texas Crim. Rep., 490, 288 S. W., 1075; Guerra v. State, 105 Texas Crim. Rep., 410, 288 S. W., 1084; Courser v. State, 106 Texas Crim. Rep., 146, 291 S. W., 236.

No bills of exception are brought forward in the record.

The judgment is affirmed.

A ffirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clark v. State
288 S.W. 1075 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1926)
Bailey v. State
282 S.W. 804 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1926)
Courser v. State
291 S.W. 236 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1927)
Guerra v. State
288 S.W. 1084 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 S.W.2d 585, 119 Tex. Crim. 286, 1932 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 74, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcclendon-v-state-texcrimapp-1932.