Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/McClendon v. State

McClendon v. State

273 So. 3d 1056
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 20, 2019·No. No. 3D19-152·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Smith v. State, 109 So.3d 1180, 1181 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) ("[S]eparate charges and convictions are not required to support a substantive violation of probation based upon the commission of a new law violation.") (citing Christian v. State, 84 So.3d 437, 445 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012) ).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McClendon v. State, 273 So. 3d 1056 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

273 So. 3d 1056 (McClendon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. State
109 So. 3d 1180 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Christian v. State
84 So. 3d 437 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)