Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/McClendon v. State

McClendon v. State

273 So. 3d 1056
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 20, 2019
DocketNo. 3D19-152
StatusPublished

This text of 273 So. 3d 1056 (McClendon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McClendon v. State, 273 So. 3d 1056 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Smith v. State, 109 So.3d 1180, 1181 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) ("[S]eparate charges and convictions are not required to support a substantive violation of probation based upon the commission of a new law violation.") (citing Christian v. State, 84 So.3d 437, 445 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012) ).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. State
109 So. 3d 1180 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Christian v. State
84 So. 3d 437 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
273 So. 3d 1056, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcclendon-v-state-fladistctapp-2019.