McClendon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McClendon v. State

141 So. 3d 1251, 2014 WL 3057497, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 10442

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 8, 2014

DocketNo. 1D13-3815

StatusPublished

This text of 141 So. 3d 1251 (McClendon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McClendon v. State, 141 So. 3d 1251, 2014 WL 3057497, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 10442 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant appeals the summary denial of a motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The State concedes that grounds one, two and five were improperly denied as facially insufficient because the trial court never granted leave to amend. Thus, we reverse and remand for the trial court to grant the appellant leave to amend grounds one, two and five pursuant to Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754 (Fla.2007) (holding that a trial court must allow the defendant at least one opportunity to amend facially insufficient claims). We otherwise affirm the order on appeal.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED and REMANDED in part.

WOLF and WETHERELL, JJ., and MONACO, TOBY S., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant appeals the summary denial of a motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The State concedes that grounds one, two and five were improperly denied as facially insufficient because the trial court never granted leave to amend. Thus, we reverse and remand for the trial court to grant the appellant leave to amend grounds one, two and five pursuant to Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754 (Fla.2007) (holding that a trial court must allow the defendant at least one opportunity to amend facially insufficient claims). We otherwise affirm the order on appeal.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED and REMANDED in part.

WOLF and WETHERELL, JJ., and MONACO, TOBY S., Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

141 So. 3d 1251, 2014 WL 3057497, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 10442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcclendon-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack