McClendon v. State

141 So. 3d 1251, 2014 WL 3057497, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 10442
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McClendon v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 12198
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 8, 2014·No. No. 1D13-3815·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant appeals the summary denial of a motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The State concedes that grounds one, two and five were improperly denied as facially insufficient because the trial court never granted leave to amend. Thus, we reverse and remand for the trial court to grant the appellant leave to amend grounds one, two and five pursuant to Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754 (Fla.2007) (holding that a trial court must allow the defendant at least one opportunity to amend facially insufficient claims). We otherwise affirm the order on appeal.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED and REMANDED in part.

WOLF and WETHERELL, JJ., and MONACO, TOBY S., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McClendon v. State, 141 So. 3d 1251, 2014 WL 3057497, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 10442 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

141 So. 3d 1251 (McClendon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Spera v. State
971 So. 2d 754 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2007)