Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/McClendon v. State

McClendon v. State

260 So. 2d 255, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6954
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 11, 1972
DocketNo. 71-797
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 260 So. 2d 255 (McClendon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McClendon v. State, 260 So. 2d 255, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6954 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the denial of a motion under Rule 3.850, CrPR, 33 F.S.A., to vacate a judgment and sentence imposed on defendant following a plea of guilty to aggravated assault. The motion alleged as the ground for relief that defendant was without counsel at the time he pled guilty. This allegation standing alone is insufficient to show a right to relief under Rule 3.850, CrPR. On this basis only we affirm the appealed order. Rose v. State, Fla.App. 1970, 235 So.2d 353.

Affirmed.

REED, C. J., and OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Randolph v. State
290 So. 2d 69 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
McClendon v. Wainwright
280 So. 2d 703 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
260 So. 2d 255, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcclendon-v-state-fladistctapp-1972.