McClendon v. State
260 So. 2d 255, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6954
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 11, 1972·No. No. 71-797·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
This is an appeal from the denial of a motion under Rule 3.850, CrPR, 33 F.S.A., to vacate a judgment and sentence imposed on defendant following a plea of guilty to aggravated assault. The motion alleged as the ground for relief that defendant was without counsel at the time he pled guilty. This allegation standing alone is insufficient to show a right to relief under Rule 3.850, CrPR. On this basis only we affirm the appealed order. Rose v. State, Fla.App. 1970, 235 So.2d 353.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McClendon v. State, 260 So. 2d 255, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6954 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).
260 So. 2d 255 (McClendon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Randolph v. State
290 So. 2d 69 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
McClendon v. Wainwright
280 So. 2d 703 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)